In addition, there are three important deductions that could distort the picture of core profitability: Stock option expenses, write-off acquired intangibles, and restructuring charges. For example, Vonage presented a “ pre-marketing operating income” and Groupon presented an “ adjusted consolidated segment operating income” by excluding marketing costs, arguing that they were investments, not expenses. So, many firms present a non-GAAP number by adding back intangible expenses. The bottom-line number thus becomes an inaccurate indicator for future profitability. The more a company invests in improving its future profits by making knowledge investments, the higher its reported losses. Yet these intangible investments are treated as expenses in calculation of profits, and not as assets. The economic purpose of these intangible investments is no different from that of an industrial company’s factories and buildings. The building blocks for a modern company are investments in research and development (R&D), branding, customer relationships, computerized data and software, and human capital. What are the reasons for increased use of non-GAAP numbers? In our previous HBR articles, we claimed that financial statements are becoming less and less useful for assessing a firm’s performance. Hand-collected data from 2010 to 2019 shows that almost a fifth of firms that report GAAP losses turn their GAAP loss into a positive non-GAAP number. Losses turning into profits is becoming quite common for firms of all sizes. It converted that loss into a non-GAAP profit of $17 million by adjusting certain costs. For example, for the fiscal year 2019, Pinterest reported a loss of $1.36 billion. Non-GAAP reporting can totally change the picture of a company’s profitability. Then they detail each item that was added or subtracted from GAAP earnings to arrive at non-GAAP earnings. Non-GAAP earnings are a customized version of earnings calculated after excluding earnings components that don’t require cash payments or are otherwise not important for understanding the future value of the firm. Here we’ll explain the benefits and downsides, as well as the reasons for increased reporting of non-GAAP numbers. Over 95% of S&P 500 companies report both GAAP and non-GAAP earnings, showing its wide prevalence. Non-GAAP, as the name suggests, is a profit number based on calculations that don’t follow accounting rules. GAAP is a fancy term for accounting rules and regulations. Compounding this development is the fact that, along with earnings based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), firms increasingly report a number called non-GAAP or pro-forma earnings. The bottom-line number in income statements, which shows a profit or a loss, is calculated after so many deductions and adjustments that it provides no assurance of a firm’s core profitability. But surprisingly, this question is becoming increasingly difficult to answer. Is a company making profit or a loss? It’s undoubtedly an important question in the minds of managers, investors, bankers, and boards of directors (investors would like to buy shares of, and banks would prefer to lend money to, a profitable company). Non-GAAP is a customized version of earnings calculated after excluding earnings components that don’t require cash payments or are otherwise not important for understanding the future value of the firm. Firms increasingly report a number called non-GAAP or pro-forma earnings along with earnings based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |